“After some false starts, I think this therapy class has arrived,” said Sharpless, an Eshelman Innovation steering board member who has served as both director of the National Cancer Institute and acting director of the Food and Drug Administration.
As evidence, he pointed to important scientific advances in radiochemistry and agent pharmacology, a better supply of isotopes, a growing commitment nationally to develop the radiopharmaceutical infrastructure and the recent approval of a blockbuster drug, Novartis’ Pluvicto, for treating metastatic prostate cancer.
“Oncology is already an interesting therapeutic class for investors, and now radiopharmaceutical therapy, being something new in oncology, is going to get a lot of attention,” he said.
Eshelman Innovation, located within the UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, partnered with the N.C. Biotechnology Center to host the event. The summit brought together university researchers, industry leaders and biotechnology investors to discuss the state of science and manufacturing strategies that can help the N.C. research ecosystem develop a vision and long-term strategy for addressing unmet needs.
“The goal was to engage stakeholders early to find out the needs and opportunities in radiopharmaceuticals,” said summit organizer Sumitra Pati, commercial strategy director for Eshelman Innovation’s Therapeutics Accelerator. “By taking a problem-driven approach, we bring concepts to investigators at the ecosystem level.”
“The field of radiopharmaceuticals is incredibly complex. There are so many different things that are involved — the radiochemistry, the choice of ligand, how these components affect metabolism in the body,” said Duke University Professor Michael Zalutsky, director of Duke’s Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry Laboratory. “But the good news is radioactivity can be monitored by imaging. So, unlike many types of therapy, you actually know where your drug is going. That puts us at an incredible developmental advantage over a lot of older therapies.”
The panelists moved from an overview of the field to deep dives into topics such as clinical indications and tissue-targeting strategies, as well as radionuclide isotopes and manufacturing.
There are challenges — and, therefore, opportunities — across the industry, from federal regulations and infrastructure to manufacturing and workforce development, the panelists said. Among other things, they pointed to outdated FDA safety guidelines, a lack of radio chemistry expertise, manufacturing supply chain shortages and the short half-life of radioisotopes.